postalnews blog

More from postalnews.com

By

NLRB: USPS Must Give APWU Staples Info

StaplesShrews14In a complaint issued Feb. 25, Region 5 of the National Labor Relations Board found merit in APWU charges that the Postal Service has improperly refused to provide the union with information about its agreement with Staples. [NLRB decision-PDF]   The pilot program has placed postal counters in 82 Staples stores — staffed with Staples employees rather than postal workers. A hearing before an Administrative Law Judge has been set for March 31.

Region 5 of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has also recommended that the board seek an injunction in federal court to compel the USPS to provide the requested information to the APWU.

The decision to recommend an injunction is extremely rare, according to the union’s attorneys. Violations carry heavy penalties for management officials who fail to comply, up to and including incarceration.

APWU President Mark Dimondstein applauded the ruling. “This is an important victory for the APWU and for postal customers. The Staples deal is a brazen attempt to privatize postal retail services and it has been shrouded in secrecy,” he said.

“Postal officials seem to forget that the Postal Service belongs to the people,” Dimondstein said. “We intend to keep reminding them.”

The union president said getting the complaint issued was a group effort. “Special thanks go to Clerk Craft Director Clint Burelson and Assistant Director Lamont Brooks for all their work toward that goal.”

The information in dispute includes:

  • Measures to protect the sanctity of the mail;
  • Training of Staples employees;
  • Criteria for determining any Postal Service compensation to Staples;
  • Discounts, if any, to be offered by Staples, and
  • Cost analyses of the Staples project.

The APWU is demanding that postal employees staff the postal counters at Staples stores. If Staples refuses, the union plans to ask Staples customers to take their business elsewhere. Postal management, on the other hand, plans to expand the program to Staples’ 1,600 stores across the country.

The union submitted an extensive set of questions about the pilot program to postal management in November, shortly after the deal was announced. In January, management brushed off the request, claiming that the Staples project was a pilot that was not covered by the Collective Bargaining Agreement. The APWU has filed a national-level dispute over the Postal Service’s contract violations.

 

  • Randy

    Great job, President Dimondstein!

  • Gregg Grubbs

    Get rid of Donahoe before it’s to late!!

  • Unwelcome Guest

    Donawhore and all of his crony crooks in Elephant Plaza should be incarcerated.

  • Stellar Steve the Window Tech

    At least he is finally addressing the sanctity of the mail issue. That would then include any and all non-postal people that touch the mail, including presort houses, contract stations, and transportation, including the company that handles our Express and Priority Mail, namely FED EX. All of the thousands of contract stations that exist in grocery stores and the like should be held to the same standards as what the APWU is expecting of Staples.

    • CASSIEWILKERSON

      Yes, agree don’t let businesses manipulate or re-direct federal laws. The reason staples doing so is denial liability but profit gain…it’s not right there is a federal legal standard as toward public held trust! Big mistake allowing Government standard decline & corporate standards once pursued corrupt dictate government or continue corporate manipulation thereof!

  • CASSIEWILKERSON

    Technically, there are old laws stating language the U.S. Mail is a service of federal government & tampering under federal penalties that issue fines as high as $50,000 or max prison 30 yrs. There is legality as agents U.S. Postal workers certain regards securing/handling mail hence their old school police uniforms…..If they third-party a business these laws sheltering against fraud to the public or issue rights over postmaster general compromise is denied the consumer. Why berate a system that should be aligned with U.S. customs and the sole agents distribute mail to U.S. soldiers or earliest usage U.S. Military Revolution as founded by Ben Franklin compromised (It’s a govt’ meaning public owned service not meant to make a profit at all). Hence, why let corporations steal our rightful service away ~ these very corporations have degraded the legal protections of this service & protection away from every citizen for B.S. manipulation of shipping corporations hoping to discount buy portions this (worlds largest & valuable logistics infrastructure)!!