2012 April 17 - postalnews blog

Archive for April 17th, 2012

USPS/NALC contract mediation efforts fail- next step arbitration

From the US Postal Service:

The mediation process with the National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO (NALC) has come to an impasse and will now enter into interest arbitration, a process which would conclude later this year.

The Postal Service is still in the mediation process with the National Postal Mail Handlers Union, AFL-CIO (NPMHU).

Contracts with both unions expired at midnight, Nov. 20, 2011. All parties agreed to extend negotiations until midnight, Dec. 16, 2011, and again until Jan. 20, 2012, at which time negotiations came to an impasse and then entered into mediation.

Under the statutory procedures that apply to postal labor negotiations, both sides first engage in mediation and, if unsuccessful, go to interest arbitration. The existing contracts will be followed until terms of a new contract are resolved.

The NALC represents nearly 195,000 employees who work as letter carriers delivering mail primarily in urban areas. The NPMHU represents more than 45,000 employees who work in mail processing plants and Post Offices. Respectively, wages and benefits for NALC- and NPMHU-represented employees exceeded $15.7 billion and $3.5 billion last year.

Unlike the private sector, when negotiations fail, postal employees are not permitted to strike as Congress has designated the Postal Service as an essential service to the nation. A neutral arbitrator determines the final outcome.

via USPS News Link Story – NALC negotiations go to arbitration.

NAPUS: Senate Takes Up Bipartisan Postal Legislation

Slightly before noontime, the Senate voted to bring up S. 1789, the Lieberman-Collins-Carper-Brown postal relief. The vote was 74-22, 14 votes more than necessary to invoke “cloture”.

The Senate is conducting general debate on postal reform and will proceed to consider amendments, the first being the “managers’ substitute” that will be filed by Senators Joseph Lieberman, Susan Collins, Tom Carper and Scott Brown. Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Lieberman outlined and explained the provisions that were to be included in the amendment to NAPUS legislative activists at NAPUS’ recent Leadership Conference. In part, the amendment make changes to S. 1789 that would strengthen the protection of community post offices and provide the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) with authority to overrule a USPS post office closing decisions; permit Medicare-eligible retired postal retirees the opportunity — not requirement — to enroll in a new less expensive FEHBP option to complement Medicare coverage, rather than duplicate it; maintain overnight mail delivery in many regions; and create opportunities for postal innovation, making better use of USPS assets. NAPUS reviewed the provisions in the amendment and has communicated its support to members of the Senate.

After voting on the managers’ substitute, individual Senators will offer additional amendments. NAPUS will carefully review each of these amendments and share our views with Senators regarding them.

via NAPUS.

S. 1789 passes cloture vote

NALC Releases White Paper on USPS Business Model, Postal Reform

WASHINGTON, April 17, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Successful revitalization of the U.S. Postal Service requires a strategic business plan that leverages the unmatched reach of its network, legislative action to relieve it of obligations no other business bears and shared sacrifice from all stakeholders, says the renowned international financial advisory firm, Lazard.

“While the Postal Service clearly faces enormous challenges, we do believe that its revitalization is achievable,” Lazard says in a white paper released on April 17. The paper, “Delivering Change to Revitalize an American Icon,” results from a due diligence investigation of the USPS commissioned in October 2011 by the National Association of Letter Carriers and conducted by a Lazard team with extensive experience in restructuring strategy.

http://www.nalc.org/whitepapers/saving_the_united_states_postal_service.pdf

Lazard outlined the basic elements of a reform plan that would aim to revitalize the Postal Service, rather than the approach being advocated by the Postal Service — an approach based on massive, and ultimately counterproductive, reductions in service. Lazard indicated that based on its analysis and experience, the Postal Service’s “shrink to survive” strategy will simply facilitate the decline of this vital American institution.

In addition, Lazard’s analysis of pending legislation (S. 1789) determined that, while the bill does not go as far as the Postal Service in proposing service reductions, the legislation still amounts to a stop-gap — not real — solution, because it does not fundamentally address the need for change in the way the Postal Service does business. And it too reduces service to the public and to America’s businesses.

“In private sector restructurings, successful turnarounds are generally premised on (i) a strategic plan that aims for a sustainable and viable enterprise and (ii) a management team and governance structure that is capable of executing that plan. Those two elements are developed first and then the necessary capital is secured. Unfortunately, this legislation provides the Postal Service with capital without either of these two elements being in place. Even worse, by adopting the Postal Service ‘s proposals to reduce the quality and value of the services it provides to American households, it may actually accelerate the Postal Service’s decline,” Lazard said.

According to Lazard, a plan to revitalize the Postal Service should include:

  • Better leveraging of the USPS delivery network to grow its parcel service business;
  • Expansion of the kinds of products and services that the Postal Service is allowed to provide (this would require congressional action);
  • Giving the Postal Service greater flexibility in pricing its products and services, some of which are notably underpriced compared to the cost of providing them (also requiring legislative action);
  • Legislative action to address the burdensome – and unique – congressional mandate requiring USPS to pre-fund retiree health care for the next 75 years in just 10 years; and
  • Shared sacrifice from of all postal stakeholders, rather than one-sided employee sacrifice.

The Lazard paper acknowledges that the Postal Service faces a financial crisis and must adapt to rapid technological changes that have reshaped — and are still reshaping — the way Americans communicate with others, primarily because of the Internet and its impact on the use of First Class Mail. On the other hand, some of those changes can stimulate new business for the Postal Service, Lazard said, such as increased delivery of packages ordered on-line.

“The Postal Service that results from these changes will have fewer employees, but will enhance (rather than degrade) the quality and value of the essential services it provides to millions of households and American businesses,” Lazard said.

The Lazard paper stresses that cuts in the number of employees and reductions in services alone can neither save the Postal Service nor enable it to adapt to the evolving needs of the American public and postal customers, both business and residential. On the contrary, they could destroy it by driving customers away and further reducing revenue.

“Similar to any successful private sector restructuring, the Postal Service requires a business plan based on a fundamental rethinking of the institution, top-to-bottom changes in its operations and culture and a first-rate management team and corporate governance structure to ensure that the plan is effectively executed,” Lazard advised.

In particular, Lazard noted, “a successful restructuring of the Postal Service must start with a plan to better leverage its unrivaled last-mile delivery network — a retail network that touches every city, town and neighborhood in America. Instead of focusing on shrinking its network and capabilities, thereby yielding its competitive advantage, the Postal Service needs an ambitious rethinking of its business model.”

“This analysis clearly shows it would be a terrible mistake for Congress or the Postal Service to rely on massive cuts in service to deal with the Service’s financial difficulties, which are real,” said Fredric V. Rolando, president of NALC. “Yet that’s exactly what they are doing. The Postal Service does need basic rethinking, but not heavy-handed, ill-considered slashes in employees, facilities and delivery services.”

Lazard based its conclusions on a review of publicly available data, including public testimony of the Postal Service’s leadership and the Postal Service’s own “Plan to Profitability,” and Lazard’s meetings with outside postal experts and users of Postal Service products and services.

Lazard’s findings reflected a full examination of the Postal Service’s “Plan to Profitability.” That plan has some reasonable assumptions and proposals, Lazard concluded, including repeal of a Congressional mandate that, since instituted, has led to a massive diversion of $21 billion of Postal Service revenues into a fund for future retirees’ health benefits.

But ultimately the Postal Service’s own plan is too focused on shrinking service to allow the agency to survive and therefore is unlikely to succeed — and will instead quite possibly worsen its business situation, Lazard said.

“The Postal Service’s proposed modifications — termination of Saturday delivery, a significant curtailment of ‘to the door’ delivery, and other reductions in service standards — could easily reduce demand by an amount equal to the alleged cost savings being discussed,” Lazard warned. Lazard noted that a Postal Service witness recently acknowledged at a Postal Regulatory Commission hearing that the combined effect of all the proposed cuts could reduce mail volume by 10 percent, offsetting almost all of the intended savings from the cuts.

Additional Information on Lazard:

Lazard is a preeminent international financial advisory firm that has long specialized in crafting solutions to address the complex financial and strategic challenges of its clients. It serves a diverse set of clients around the world, including corporations, partnerships, institutions, governments and individuals.

Lazard and its senior professionals have extensive experience in the reorganization and restructuring of troubled companies and have advised debtors, creditors, equity constituencies and government agencies in numerous complex financial reorganizations. Since 1990, Lazard’s professionals have been involved in over 250 restructurings, representing over $1 trillion in debtor assets. Lazard also has over 35 years of government advisory experience involving over 40 sovereign assignments.

About NALC

Founded in 1889, the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) is the union of city letter carriers employed by the U.S. Postal Service. NALC has 284,000 members; about a quarter of whom are military veterans. It is affiliated with the AFL-CIO and with UNI, an international alliance of communications unions.

SOURCE National Association of Letter Carriers

 

S. 1789 to proceed to Senate Floor for Debate, Consideration, and a Eventually a Vote

The League of Postmasters reports that S. 1789 will get a cloture vote today, which clears the way for the Senate to debate and vote on the measure:

Both parties in the Senate have reached an agreement to reconsider the cloture vote today, April 17, on the motion to proceed to S.1789 that failed a little less than a month ago. Following routine morning business, the motion to proceed to the motion to reconsider the vote by which cloture was not invoked on the motion to proceed to S.1789 will be taken up, and the agreement is that the motion to reconsider will be agreed to.

This will start around 11 a.m., with the vote around 11:10. It will be cable and web cast on CSPAN 2. That means that S. 1789 will go to the Senate floor today for debate and ultimately for a vote on passage. Debate will surely last several days, or more.

Initially, there will be a managers amendment in the nature of a substitute bill. This will strike all the language of S. 1789 and replace it with the language of the managers amendment. That amendment includes most of the text of S. 1789 but adds some measures, deletes others, and changes still others. You can see the managers amendment in the nature of a substitute here. Once the managers amendment passes, the amended bill will be the subject of the debate. Many amendments are expected.