USPS Asks PRC to Accelerate Review of Network and Service Cuts

From the US Postal Service:

The U.S. Postal Service today asked the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) to expedite consideration of the Postal Service’s plan to make its operations more efficient, reduce costs and ensure the long-term affordability of mail.

The request filed with the PRC calls on the Commission to issue its non-binding advisory opinion on planned Postal Service network and service standard changes by mid-April 2012. The current moratorium on the closing of any Post Office or mail processing facility expires on May 15, 2012. The Postal Service voluntarily agreed to the moratorium in response to congressional requests in the hope it would help facilitate the enactment of comprehensive postal legislation.

The Postal Service had laid out a carefully designed plan to return to profitability while meeting the changing needs of its customers. The plan includes reducing the number of mail processing facilities from 460 today to fewer than 200 by 2013 and revising mail delivery service standards. The network changes will provide more predictable and reliable service and is part of a broader effort to stabilize the Postal Service finances and continue to provide affordable, universal service for generations to come.

The PRC issued a schedule last week that guarantees the Commission will not issue its non-binding advisory opinion until July 10, 2012, at the earliest. The Postal Service would like to move forward with its planned network and service standard changes with the benefit of the PRC’s advisory opinion, which it would need to have well before May 15.

The Postal Service believes that more than four months, from Dec. 5, 2011 to mid-April 2012, is adequate time for the PRC to evaluate and comment on these proposed operational changes.

The request filed with the PRC is available at

  • Pingback: USPS Asks PRC to Accelerate Review of Network and Service Cuts – postalnews blog - intelisent Postal Affairs Blog

  • georgeb

    usps closed 7 district officces saving 1 billion a year close 35 more save 5 billion ayear

  • Annonymus

    It is all very political and all about money to those at the top. Reducing districts is a good option. I was on district staff several years and back in the field now I see little impact of the district in the day to day operations of a delivery unit

  • Scout

    Question:Why does the USPS have to be profitable?USPS means United States Postal Service, yes the last word is service not LLC, not Corp, not Inc. It is a service to the American people.We should not have to make a profit, we should be a non profit for the people of USA.