CAMDEN, N.J. – A former secretary-treasurer of a U.S. Postal Workers Union today admitted embezzling $34,500 of union funds, U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito announced. Continue reading
On Aug. 8, the Maintenance Craft reached a settlement with the USPS regarding Handbook MS-1, TL-5 and TL-6 Revisions and Related Maintenance Management Orders, originally grieved by current Maintenance Division Director Idowu Balogun.
On Sept. 13, 2017, Arbitrator Goldberg remanded the MS-1 revisions case nos. Q10T-4Q-C-14171644/ Q10T-4Q-C-16481407 back to the APWU and USPS for resolution, directing the Postal Service to provide the APWU with all data and data analysis collected by the Postal Review Team.
The new settlement designates that maintenance work in stations and branches transitioning to Field Maintenance Operations (FMO) as a result of MS-1/TL-6 will continue to performed by the employees currently performing those duties.
It also stipulates that:
When attrition at the installation results in a staffing level below the authorized complement, management may determine the occupational group of the employee(s) that will continue to perform the work in the stations and branches… due to the transferring of maintenance work of stations and branches from plant maintenance to FMO, the FMO authorized staffing may increase in order to provide maintenance for the stations and branches. For FMO staffing increases that exceed the available plant LDC 37…those positions shall be posted and filled under the FMO in accordance with Article 38 and the Joint Contract Interpretation Manual (JCIM).
The Postal Service will publish the final versions of MS-1 TL 6 and MMOs on Aug. 8, 2019.
Click here to see the full settlement on Q10T-4Q-C-14171644/ Q10T-4Q-C-16481407.
Register today for MS 1 TL5/TL 6 Settlement and Implementations on Monday Aug 19, 2019 2:00 PM EDT. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
On June 17, 2019, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, the Department filed suit against American Postal Workers Union (APWU) Local 230 (located in Manchester, N.H.). Continue reading
On Monday, June 3 President Mark Dimondstein and Industrial Relations Director Vance Zimmerman informed the National Executive Council (NEC) that the mediation process was unsuccessful in leading to a voluntary collective bargaining agreement. Continue reading
05/03/2019 – The APWU is continuing to move forward towards interest arbitration. Preparation of hearing presentations, evidence, and witnesses is occurring every day. Continue reading
04/12/2019 – The APWU continues our offensive against the White House proposals to sell the Postal Service to private corporations.
The lighthearted video below makes a crucial point – of all the many things the Postal Service will accept from the public, tax dollars are not one of them. The video advertisement release is in coordination with Tax Day actions all over the country on Monday, April 15. Continue reading
From the American Postal Workers Union:
04/09/2019 – In our continuing efforts to get the contract the members deserve, the APWU invoked mediation on April 3, 2019 – sending a letter to the Acting Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and to the Postal Service. Continue reading
(This article first appeared in the March/April 2019 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine)
By Industrial Relations Director Vance Zimmerman
Our efforts to reach a new contract are now entering the next phases of mediation and interest arbitration.
In mediation, an impartial mediator engages the Postal Service and the APWU negotiating teams in an attempt to break through any impasses and reach an agreement. If mediation does not lead to a voluntary agreement, we will move to interest arbitration.
Most of you are familiar with grievance arbitration – also called rights arbitration. During rights arbitration, an impartial arbitrator is presented testimony, receives evidence and arguments, and then writes an award. Hearings last a few hours or a few days. The rights arbitrator can’t change the contract language, but decides whether someone’s rights under the contract have been violated.
In contrast, an interest arbitrator has the power to write contract language – to change rights, determine pay, benefits, and work rules. In doing so, he/she considers the interests of the parties in various proposals.
Working together with the core negotiating team and craft officers, we have been preparing for the possibility of interest arbitration throughout negotiations, including researching, collecting data, and working with professionals. The union must present facts, data, and arguments to convince the arbitrator why he/she ought to favor APWU proposals over USPS proposals.
This arbitration will involve a panel of three (3) arbitrators. APWU will appoint an advocate arbitrator – someone advocating for the union’s views. The Postal Service will also have an advocate arbitrator. The parties will then jointly select a neutral arbitrator who will chair the panel and run the hearings.
Selecting the neutral arbitrator is a complicated process. Given that even a single penny increase in hourly wages would result in a cost of millions of dollars to the USPS and that the union and the USPS will present a lot of economic data in the arbitration process, the neutral arbitrator must be experienced and able to deal with large numbers.
Each side will provide a list of arbitrators they would like to see as the neutral arbitrator. We will then attempt to mutually agree on the neutral. If the sides cannot mutually agree to an arbitrator, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) will provide the parties a list of arbitrators. Then, each side will eliminate an arbitrator until there is only one name remaining. That final name would then be the neutral arbitrator and panel chair.
With the panel set, arbitration can commence. In past interest arbitrations, multiple hearing dates have taken place. When hearings conclude, both parties may submit closing briefs before the panel goes into deliberations and issues an award establishing our new contract.
During the hearings, we will present data and evidence that supports our proposals. We have engaged a team of economists who will detail relevant trends in the economy, comparison of wage levels and trends in comparable jobs. The economists will also present publicly available data that is relevant to postal compensation, work hours, benefits, and scheduling. Panels of employees from every APWU craft and many different jobs will explain what they do and the conditions in which they work. Experts will provide testimony in job analysis and job comparisons. We will also present survey data from many sources. Your craft officers will testify about the work their crafts do and how important it is. Also, other subject matter experts will explain why we need changes to certain work rules. Finally, we will spend a lot of time and effort in the hearings to rebut the testimony and evidence of the Postal Service.
This effort requires a team of national officers, attorneys, staff, dozens of witnesses, and hundreds of exhibits. It will require days of hearings to present our case and days of hearings to rebut the case the Postal Service will present. Together with your core negotiating committee and craft officers, we promise to work hard to get a contract that recognizes your value. Let’s work and stand together. Show management our unity and solidarity as we are Fighting Today for a Better Tomorrow!
03/29/2019 – The White House released its plans for the fiscal year 2020 budget this month. It once again attacks workers, calling for deep cuts to salaries, retirement and health benefits. It also echoes parts of the Postal Task Force December 2018 report that calls for the elimination of union negotiated collective bargaining rights over pay, creating a postal employee pay system similar to what is seen in the federal workforce. Continue reading
03/08/2019 – On March 7, 2019, the APWU and United States Postal Service negotiators exchanged their final economic proposals as both sides continue their preparation for interest arbitration. Continue reading