Does the new PMG see the glass as half-full?

The following message from National Association of Letter Carriers Fred Rolando, appeared in the March 2015 Postal Record, published by the NALC:

NALC-LOGOYou can’t judge a new CEO on the basis of only one week on the job. That would be like judging a book based on its opening chapter or the color of its cover. But I was encouraged by the performance of Megan Brennan during her first week on the job as the 74th postmaster general of the United States—at least in comparison with her predecessor. Three things stand out.

First, she posted a letter to all postal employees on the USPS website that set a very positive tone—focusing on themes that will unite us: innovation, growth and working together to overcome the challenges we face.

Second, she immediately met with each of the presidents of the Postal Service’s four employee unions. Doing so shows respect for the craft employees who make the Postal Service what it is every day, an amazing public service and an invaluable part of the nation’s economic infrastructure. My first conversation with her was very constructive and useful; I look forward to many more like it.

And third, she shifted—in a subtle but significant way—the manner in which the Postal Service communicates with the media and the public about our financial performance, again accentuating the positive. I want to focus on this last step the most because I think it is essential for achieving the kind of postal reform legislation that will strengthen the Postal Service, not dismantle it.

A year ago in this space (the March 2014 issue of The Postal Record), I called the way the Postal Service was communicating its quarterly reports “financial malpractice.” That’s because its press releases routinely highlighted the negative and buried the good news. The opening lines of its press release for the first fiscal quarter of last year was typical: “The U.S. Postal Service ended the first quarter of its 2014 fiscal year with a net loss of $354 million. This marks the 19th of the last 21 quarters that it has sustained a loss.”

Never mentioned in that release was the cost of the Postal Service’s grossly unfair mandate to pre-fund future retiree health benefits, which was responsible for the entire loss. Also not mentioned was the Postal Service’s operating profit (“controllable profit/loss”) of $754 million.

The press briefing that followed the release was even worse. The first slide featured a grossly misleading portrayal of the Postal Service’s balance sheet—highlighting an allegedly huge gap between the agency’s assets and liabilities. (See page 12 of this issue to read about a new report on the Postal Service’s assets and liabilities, by the USPS Office of Inspector General, that offers a more accurate picture of the Postal Service’s balance sheet.) The clear message was: the Postal Service was failing at best and a financial basket case at worst.

Why all the doom and gloom before now? The headline of the press release for that quarter provided the answer: “U.S. Postal Service Records Loss of $354 Million in First Quarter, Underscoring Need for Comprehensive Legislation.” The former PMG wrongly believed that the best way to get Congress to enact postal reform was to “yell fire in crowded theater.” This panic-creating approach never worked to convince lawmakers to enact the changes he wanted.

That’s why it is so refreshing to see the new PMG portray the first-quarter results for FY 2015 more accurately. She didn’t bury the impact of pre-funding, but she put it in proper prospective— it’s a problem that must be solved by Congress to help the Postal Service build on its strong recovery. Indeed, the title of the press release this year says it all: “U.S. Postal Service Delivers on ‘Our Season.’ ” The release highlighted a 4.3 percent increase in revenue, a 3.5 percent increase in Standard Mail volume and a 12.8 percent increase in package volume along with the overall net loss figure.

During the press briefing, the agency’s chief financial officer managed to acknowledge that the USPS had a “fantastic” quarter—a fair characterization of a $1.1 billion operating profit.

This shift in focus is crucially important. Congress, the mailing industry, postal employees and the public all need to know that the Postal Service is not a lost cause, that its future can be bright with the right kind of reform. We don’t need to dismantle the Postal Service; we need to invest in its future, which was another positive theme in the new PMG’s letter to postal employees. So all in all, it was a good opening week for the new boss.

Of course, we know that we will have disagreements with PMG Brennan in the future; it is the nature of a collective bargaining relationship. But as I told her, if she is willing to negotiate in good faith to reward career carriers and CCAs alike for our hard work, , NALC will reciprocate and seek to creatively solve problems at the bargaining table and on Capitol Hill.

If we can both do that, the glass will be more than half-full.

National Association of Letter Carriers AFL-CIO.

  • Postal Pete

    Judging from management’s attitude in the first negotiating sessions with the APWU,don’t expect any good faith negotiations on management’s part,so they better have the best labor law lawyers when the contract expires in May as it moves to interest arbitration,ditto for other the postal unions next year. And actions speak louder than words and she is going ahead with the further unnecessary shrinking of the mail processing network and degradation of service.

  • Jim

    Hopefully the service can survive after the brutal downgrade of service that will finally start feeling full force toward the end of April. glta

  • TGIRetired

    She has taken over at a time when service standards have changed and also 82 plants are on the chopping block.Thousands of small offices nationwide have had their window hours reduced forcing many postmasters to either retire or find work elsewhere.Thousands of postal employees will either be forced to relocate or accept jobs in other career fields.CCA attrition rate in some areas is as high as 40%.Hiring career employees is a thing of the past.Welcome to your new job,Megan!!

  • dcr

    She is a liar like the rest of management. She has her mandate from congress and that is to destroy the Postal Service. She will just not be so vocal about doing it, unlike Dohawhore. It’s the fox guarding the hen house!

  • MrZip

    I, for one would like to give her the benefit of the doubt and take a wait and see attitude. For one, THERE IS NO CHOICE. There is nothing that can be done to immediately change any plans that she has. It IS possible that she will try to see things a everyone being on the same team instead of management vs. craft. On the other hand, could just be a wolf in sheep’s clothing. What I am saying is that ‘time will tell.’
    In my opinion, Management’s (present/past) style (aggressively hostile), is the product of a “trickle down” environment. If my sup. doesn’t discipline me, they get disciplined for not doing so, and their superior gets disciplined if they don’t discipline the sup., and up the ladder it goes. It’s all “cover my a**.” And it’s a horrible way to manage. It DOES get some immediate results, but it creates a hostile work environment and destroys morale, loyalty and comradeship.

    Just my 2¢

  • MrZip

    I think that people will get used to it. In my opinion, the USPS should never have set the high standards that they are now abandoning. Everyone accepted that a letter might take a few days to get to its destination (hence the term “snail mail”). The “postmark” had a lot of integrity too. Now a significant amount of mail doesn’t even get a legible postmark. One day delivery was a nice idea, but it taxed “the system” too much. And then they changed all of the “collection’ times (in my area) to 9:30am (from 5:00pm). So if I put a letter in the mailbox at 11:00am, it still took 2 days to get delivered because it sat in the mailbox until the pick up on the following day. Yes, the USPS recorded it as one day delivery, but that is meaningless to the customer placing the letter in the mailbox.

    Just my 2¢